9 in 10 UK Packaging Producers Still Supply Hard-to-Recycle Materials, Defra Data Reveals
Priory Direct • 30 July 2026
Newly released figures from the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra) show a wide gap between sustainability ambition and reality in UK packaging. The vast majority of obligated producers are still placing materials on the market that are difficult, or impossible, to recycle — just as eco-modulated Extended Producer Responsibility (pEPR) fees begin to bite.
The numbers behind the headline
The data
The figures came to light through a Freedom of Information request submitted by BagKraft, a manufacturer of sustainable bags and promotional packaging, and were released by Defra under Environmental Information Regulations. They cover the 11,701 businesses currently obligated under the UK’s packaging producer responsibility rules.
Of those producers, 89% are still supplying packaging that is non-recyclable, hard to recycle, or of mixed composition. Only around one in ten has fully transitioned to packaging classified as readily recyclable.
Red, amber and green ratings
Under the Recyclability Assessment Methodology (RAM) developed by PackUK and Defra, household packaging is rated red, amber or green. That rating determines how much a producer pays under the modulated pEPR scheme — the worse the recyclability, the higher the fee.
The breakdown is stark. 14% of producers supply exclusively red-rated packaging, meaning one in seven businesses remains entirely reliant on materials classed as difficult or problematic to recycle. A further 1% supply strictly amber-rated packaging. Three-quarters (75%) supply a mix of red, amber and green — showing that the majority have started, but not completed, the shift.
Why it matters now
Eco-modulation under pEPR applies from the 2026–2027 financial year, so recyclability ratings now translate directly into cost. Producers sitting on red or mixed-material portfolios face escalating fees on top of the reputational and regulatory pressure. The data reframes packaging choice as a financial decision rather than purely an environmental one.
“This data from Defra is a stark reminder that while the conversation around sustainability is everywhere, the physical transition is lagging. Moving away from red and mixed-material packaging isn’t just an environmental obligation anymore — with pEPR fees escalating, it is a financial necessity.” Jon Marling
Managing Director, BagKraft
What producers should do
Audit your packaging portfolio
Identify which components fall into red, amber or green ratings under the RAM. You can’t manage a fee exposure you haven’t measured.
Prioritise the red-rated items
Mixed-material and hard-to-recycle formats attract the highest modulated fees. Switching these first delivers the fastest cost reduction.
Switch to recyclable, fibre-based alternatives
Widely recycled formats — cardboard boxes, paper-based void fill, and recyclable padded envelopes — move packaging toward the green zone while remaining kerbside-recyclable for customers.
Act ahead of the deadline
With eco-modulation live from 2026–2027, early movers insulate themselves from rising fees while meeting growing customer expectations.
At Priory Direct, our range is built around planet-friendly, widely recyclable materials — helping businesses move out of the red and toward genuinely recyclable packaging without compromising on protection or performance.
Sources
- edie — Defra: 9 in 10 packaging producers use unsustainable materials
- Packaging Europe — Businesses continue to use less recyclable materials under EPR
- Packaging News — Data shows many producers still struggling with recyclability
- Interplas Insights — Defra reveals nine out of ten producers use non-sustainable materials









